It’s interesting how trendlines with low correlation coefficients are, in fact, almost useless. Here is yesterday’s short-term trend:
Downward slope (loss) but at the low rate of 1.1lbs/week, but notice the low r^2. Now we add today’s data point and drop the oldest one and get:
This looks like big improvement, slope is much greater (more loss) and r^2 is much higher, probably high enough to consider the trendline as real.
But what actually happened? I add a new point which is a small gain and then rolled-off the older point which was a significant deviation (and lower). So any “improvement” is an illusion. If anything the point I rolled off and the point I added are the same, within statistical significance, but this creates the illusion of a steeper drop by removing an earlier “good” point.
This is very frustrating. While having an absolute increase (rather than just stalling) while sticking to extreme diet and extreme exercise was worse (when that happened four weeks ago and freaked me) this resistance to any further loss now is worse. I’ve actually increased the activities that should make a difference and the weight stubbornly persists as unchanged. Without any positive feedback, from rather severe diet and exercise, it’s hard to keep it up without any reward.
And bogus statistical analysis isn’t helping.