So sad, what are you doing, Nate?

I first heard that Nate Silver has added a climate change denialist to his blog on PZ’s blog, but it took me a bit of time to check it out. By the time I got to 538 and under the Science tab, sure enough, there it was. Roger Piekle, Jr., well-known shil for the carbon folks claiming that climate disaster are costing more simply because we’re richer (hey, go see where the damage was in Sandy, sure a few rich peoples’ beach houses, but plenty of crummy neighborhoods, plus the subways in NYC have been there for decades and never flooded before).

Now if there is anyone who should know how to deal with statistics it should be Nate, but he invites a well-known liar, who cherry-picks statistics to try to prove his preconceived (and bought-and-paid-for) notions. Come on, Nate, you know that bias in statistical analysis is bad, you say so in your book.

Even in his book Nate points out the problem. In reporting on how the Japanese chose to ignore power law in earthquakes and deliberately put a “kink” (instead of straight line, they chose an arbitrary inflection point is the scarce data portion of the curve). That meant they built the seawalls too low around their nuke plant, just to say investors a few bucks. After the single large earthquake datapoint was added to the dataset, there is was, the actual power law relationship validated. Nate uses this as an example of how to lie (or, at best, deceive yourself) with limited data.

So now he hires a guy to do exactly that on his blog. The general belief is that Nate wants to stir the pot a bit, get the justly deserved outrage, and thus drive hits to his blog and thus his pocketbook. In the absence of any hard data this is as good an excuse as any. Even his buddies at HuffPo are denouncing his climate change denialism.

So fame and the money it will bring can corrupt anyone. So sad, Nate. So as others are saying stick to sports forecasting and stay out of science you don’t understand.


About dmill96

old fat (but now getting trim and fit) guy, who used to create software in Silicon Valley (almost before it was called that), who used to go backpacking and bicycling and cross-country skiing and now geodashes, drives AWD in Wyoming, takes pictures, and writes long blog posts and does xizquvjyk.
This entry was posted in comment, rant and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to So sad, what are you doing, Nate?

  1. dmill96 says:

    Jon Stewart had traitor Nate on his show tonight and gave him plenty of opportunity to dismiss the criticism he’s gotten, esp. for the climate denialism article (which Stewart didn’t attack at all) and for the flap with Krugman which Nate tried to dismiss with his weirdo attempt at humor. No, Nate – you are a sellout, you’re hoping for the billion dollar buyout from Facebook and you’ve gotten greed fever like all the rest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s